STALIN AND THE WIND OF HISTORY- III : ANDREI FURSOV
[Andrei Fursov is a Russian Historian and Sociologist, who has written extensively on the real agenda of de-stalinization and the psychology operating behind it. Socialist India is publishing this very important essay by Fursov in 3 parts. This is the third and final part of the essay. ]
The first part can be read here : https://blogsocialistindia.wordpress.com/2018/10/20/stalin-and-the-wind-of-history-i-andrei-fursov/
The second part can be read here : https://blogsocialistindia.wordpress.com/2018/10/20/stalin-and-the-wind-of-history-ii-andrei-fursov/
Equating Stalin to Hitler, and the USSR to the Third Reich, coupled with the talk that Stalin lies on the same fault in starting the war as Hitler, and perhaps even more, working in the same direction – to hang on the Soviet Union (and hence Russian) blame for the outbreak of war, to impose the complex of historical guilt and inferiority. That is, from the practical-political aspect of everything clearly and simply.
More interesting, in my opinion, metaphysico-historical aspect of the problem causes of hatred of the Western elite to Stalin. The fact that Stalin thrice thwarted the plans of the top – right of the globalists is to establish a global peace under the aegis of something like world government, the need for which many said the Warburgs, the Rockefellers and their intellectual voices of attendants. However, it is fair to say that the necessity of something like a world government talked about in the nineteenth century the Rothschilds, however, the Russian tsars Alexander I and Nicholas I of its policy the opportunity blew. Hence the hatred of the Rothschilds to Romanov – as they say, at the end of the XIX century one of the Rothschilds said that their family peace with the Romanovs and their Russia is impossible.
Stalin made for breaking “tataki” global “Supreme,” called “world government” more than all the tsars put together, using the contradictions between the right-wing globalists. Sickle red Empire three times he cut down sheaves of globalization on the field of the history of the twentieth century.
The first time Stalin did it in the second half of 1920-ies, in 1927 to 1929, when his team based on remaining power of a Large System “Russia”, on the assistance of the representatives of razvedstruktur the Russian Empire and the contradictions in the environment of a military secret, replaced the project “world revolution” project “of the red (socialist) Empire”. The finintern in its plans to create Venice the size of Europe or the world in General had to deploy the project “world war” and lead to power of Hitler in every possible way strengthening a particular state – the Third Reich. As a result of the Anglo-American pumping sharply increased in 1929 – the year of the expulsion of Trotsky from Russia (“farewell bow” Stalin’s scheme of “world revolution”), “Hitler incorporated” was able to fight, playing the role of aggressor in written for him the play. By “play” he was to smash the USSR, and then to fall under the impact of the Anglo-Saxons.
However, the Story – treacherous Queen, everything turned out differently, and Stalin for the second time foiled the plans of the globalists, defeating Hitler. And helped him fight the UK and USA that crushes during the war, not only the Third Reich but also the Third British Empire (the Second ended with deposition of North American States).
The third time Stalin foiled the plans of the globalists in the USSR, not allowing to throw my neck into the noose of the Marshall plan, created the nuclear shield and sword, and not recovered for 20, as predicted Western specialists, and for 10 years, becoming at the turn of 1940-1950-ies in the superpower.
Stalin – the designer and General designer of the only geo-historical project that can oppose globalism – the neo-Imperial. In the early twentieth century globalist (capitalist-based) project of the Anglo-Saxons – the British Empire and the United States – faced with the fact of the existence of empires, which prevented by virtue of its existence, the realization of their project. Chief among these four were two empires – German and Russian. Them and bleed each other, and then broke, using and strengthening internal contradictions. The first world war – terminator Eurasian empires. About ten years everything went as planned, but at the end of the 1920s, the process is out of control: the command of Stalin took over and on left and on right (for those and other Russia was an appendage of the West, the bundle of sticks in the bourgeois hearth) and over 10 years built the red Empire with a powerful military-industrial complex – built by using a global trends and global contradictions, which put itself on service. Stalin found the Golden key to a secret door of a military secret-globalist – profit that one of them could get by investing in the USSR, competing with the other part.
Stalin is the author and Creator of the only successful anti-globalization project of the twentieth century. It clearly showed that it is possible to oppose the globalists and how to fight them. If you count the year of the collapse in the USSR globalist project in its “world-revolutionary form,” 1929 (indicative of coagulation in the same year of the NEP, closely hanging the USSR to globalization – left-right dialectic), we can say that Stalin pushed the advent of globalization, exactly 60 years to the final delivery Gorbachev in Malta on 2-3 December 1989. Clearly, what is to forgive “Masters of the world game” never will. Moreover, Stalin demonstrated the technology of dealing with them by making a request for the deployment of the game and its economy, including alternative world market and undermining of the dollar’s position. Here, the globalists had to exclaim, as one of Russian poets of the XVIII century: “Get the old man to love?” Of course, it is impossible. This “old man” as Uncle Joe or Old Joe, as Stalin called the Anglo-Saxons, to love not to hate. With that said, the analysis of Stalinism and the Soviet experience, mandatory historical criticism of the first and second, correction of mistakes – is an urgent task for us.
There is another interesting quirk of the anti-Stalinist campaign in the West (and we in this direction actively working “fifth column”) – the equation of Stalinism and Hitlerism, practical-political aspect which were discussed above. But there is a more interesting aspect. I agree with those analysts who point to the similarity of objectives of the current global elite and the Nazi elite: both emanate from the need for a radical reduction of the world population, both fans neverdusky order and structures of global governance; both are anti – Christian. The third Reich was not an alternative to globalism; he was a tool of the global elite (highly benefited from the implementation of the project “the Third Reich” – above all, financially) and at the same time brutal experiment to establish a “new world order” (after which it was possible to implement soft).
Stalin’s neo-Imperial anti-capitalism was an alternative to how Hitler’s and the Anglo-Saxon “new order”. That is why Stalinism trying not only to equalize with Hitlerism, but to present it more hard totalitarianism than this last. Thus, first, the similarity camouflaged Hitler’s new order and the “new world order” of post-war Anglo-Saxon globalists; secondly, compromised, removed from the agenda the only real alternative to (capitalist) globalism and the stop Stories in the spirit of “3 D” (deindustrialization, depopulation, denationalization consciousness and behavior), which is commissioned by the owners to develop hundreds of “think tanks.” This alternative – neomarket on anti-capitalist basis.
The stronger the resistance to globalism, the more will be remembered the figure of Stalin and the historical experience of the USSR, which, of course, impossible and no need to restore or replay. Stalin made mistakes, sometimes very annoying. Yes, it is wine for a number of processes and phenomena – wine, which he shared with his time. But it is the fate of all statesmen. And isn’t the fault of the British and American politicians? Even as it is, and it is the negative aspect of Stalin. Who ordered to put the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, although there was no military necessity? Who ordered to bomb Cambodia, killing about a million people – to shade this fact Paul Sweat “colored” extra million and a half victims and began to shout to the world about the atrocities of the Cambodian Communists. And that’s about almost 1 million Hutus and Tutsis, and about 2 million inhabitants of neighbouring countries, the cut in the 1990s, with the acquiescence (at least) of the world elite, i.e. Western and African capitalists somehow keep quiet. And only when it became necessary to use the genocide in Central Africa, these “dancing in the glory of monsters” (so is called one of the best books about these events) as a means to strike at 2-3 dozens of representatives of the global elite, i.e. for internal fights, about the massacre remembered 18 years later, and on August 17, 2012 a lawsuit was filed to the chief Prosecutor of the International court of justice. Examples could be multiplied, but the situation is clear.
…Once Stalin said: there is a logic of intentions is the logic of the circumstances and the logic of circumstances stronger than the logic intentions. There is the intention of some forces, layers to blacken Stalin and the Soviet past, hiding in the black many negative and sometimes catastrophic results postsovietique, lack of control, inability to historical creativity (what creativity? It’s a flaw, and the task is to educate qualified consumers to stupidly bathed in wretched petroplast and nothing thought).
But there are circumstances. These circumstances – the real life of the Russian Federation on the eve of a new round of privatization reforms; this budget for 2013 budget, which sows doubt about the fact that Russia is a “social state”; it is the circumstances of the planned 1 January 2013 the reduction of accumulative part of pension with 6% of salary to 2% (this is not an elimination of the pension system?); it is the circumstances of reduction of the population of the Russian Federation and slipping it into raw material appendages of the West in comparison not only with the USSR but even with the Russian Empire; this and much more. These circumstances are the background and the object of comparison with the Stalinist era. The reforms carried out in Russia since 1992 – the best advertising of Stalin and his era, the argument in their favor, and not a random success of Stalin, in spite of the vilification of “scavengers” – in competition “the Name Russia”. This success based on the achievements of the Stalin era, both material and social, on the Grand Style and Grand Strategy of the era, very many startled at the top. The contest showed that the leader was right: the Wind not only swept the debris from his grave, and blew on it gadiva pygmies. Contrary to blacken Stalin’s name became the “name of Russia”, technically not first, but long was in the lead (and we all understand).
Since the “Name of Russia” contest as time passed, but the fears persist, with new – before the revolution. Not so long ago one high-ranking official, apparently, trying to convince himself, said that Russia can not again turn to the left (mass nationalization, etc.). And then warned those of his unwise policy provokes such events: if the mood in society is changing, any attempt to influence him (apparently, means — to influence by force) will lead to very bad consequences: because if to influence, it is at once a revolution (that’s all it is, “there it is” worth it). However, after a few days another high-ranking official Bravo reassured colleague: the scenario of “color revolutions”, for example, “orange”, nobody will allow.
Can’t be distracted by “digression”: the confidence of bureaucrats that they are – lords of the historic elements, touches. Don’t forget, in 1995 Viktor Chernomyrdin stated that Russia has exhausted the limit on revolutions, believing that he could speak on behalf of Russian history. Not every statesman can afford these things, Oh and the hero of the age of premedicate. How do you need to break away from reality to blurt out such misuse?! Good about the ruling layer-1990s, said A. Markeev, comparing them with a flock of penguins, which are located at the tip of the iceberg and I think that control its movement, although don’t actually know not only about the direction of ocean currents, but also of their existence. However, is it is characteristic only of 1990-ies?
In real history, as rightly said N. Mandelstam, “the winner is the one who caught the General trends of history and has managed to use them”, i.e. someone who understands the direction of currents in the ocean. Stalin said on this occasion differently: harness the laws of history, but the essence is the same. In other words, revolutions happen or not not happen by volition or spells clerks and small hazeisim, which made the power, but even very large figures. Revolutions are driven by other forces.
Next. If Russia and possible revolution, not orange – red. And this last will be a response to something more terrible than the revolution. Revolution is something ofstructures and developing within certain limits, it is Order arising from Chaos. This Chaos is the reaction of the vast and seemingly amorphous, viscous mass at alien aggression towards her. Once K. Pobedonostsev noticed that Russia is a viscous country: neither revolution nor reaction here to the end don’t pass (as if overhearing, the group “Nautilus-Pompilius sang: “In this country, which is as tough as dirt,/ You could be Tolstoy, you may be lost”). But the amorphous and the viscosity of these seem so with zapamietania point of view. Actually the mass is hard, Zapadenergo hidden from view, the frame. This is a Great System. The authorities in Russia, as a rule, or understood it poorly or not at all understood, except Stalin. Yes, the mass in Russia/in Russia did not rise to the power pyramid, they are introduced from the outside – from the Horde, from the eighteenth century from the West. “Rulers have always created the idea of the pyramid from the outside, – wrote O. Markeev, is fascinated by order and grandeur of the overseas capitals. They do not, and the weight was decided to envelop her life-giving slime to feed to the top of the life-giving juices or reject, allowing to live by itself to unexpectedly ruin one a powerful impetus bubbling energy of the womb […] just a Matter of time and patience of the masses.”
In many respects deceptive is chaotic and troubled times, including the one we are experiencing since the 1990’s. Here’s a look from the practice environment, very far from scientific. Legendary killer Alex-soldiers/Alexey Sherstobitov in a serious book “the Liquidator” writes about the 1990s: “Slowly I began to understand the chaos around me and paid attention to the harmony of his order – it was chaos not only created great works, but large-scale things from infrastructure to the universe. Those (chaotic. – A. F.) they appear to be due to a misunderstanding (by an observer. – A. F.) the rational order of things and the formulas by which they are created. And […] even the possession of knowledge does not guarantee good luck in the ordering of chaotic motion, and even examine it in detail and that would be it understood, not able to describe.” Not to mention not having the knowledge and considering any reality, including Russian, through the prism of Western order. It is clear that through this prism that any reality will be chaos – which is why almost all of the reforms in Russia were counterproductive, and the result brought Stalin’s snatch.
A propos: separately in our days there is a kind of social necrophilia. The desire to role model, to the orders of this society, which is up in the pus blemish, immobile social impotence and not able to maintain any racial or historical or religious identity, i.e. covered by a will to death, is not that other, as a cultural-historical necrophilia, let’s leave the dead to bury their dead. Those who are calling us in “the civilized world”, I want to lead us to the cemetery, in the best case – in the trash “fields of wonders” in the “country of fools”. Getting in the trash, and in peripheral-trademarka version, was blocked by Stalin and his team in the 1930-ies, and have enough inertia to 1980-ies. The Europe that one could say in the words of Arthur Rimbaud as a place “where a kid/ In odorous dusk before the groove is waste,/ zagruschu and Involuntarily listening to the quiet, For the boat in a hurry, like a moth is fragile”, is long gone. Europe (and the West in General) today — it is rather a reserve of goblins, only the goblins themselves are mostly non-indigenous people (although the local goblins enough): kordowski “heart of darkness” now has scored in Europe – it’s retribution for centuries of colonial plunder. But that’s their problem – the problem of “nobody’s home”; “nobody’s house” – so named Britain the times of Thatcher, a British journalist, but the same can be said about Europe. “Nobody’s home” is the ideal of the globalists, which several times in the twentieth century chipped Stalin: the USSR was the common house.
Returning to the pyramid scheme and weight, note: only such a pyramid that meets the established forms of the collective unconscious and meets them is able to function normally in Russia, relying on an invisible frame. It is very well understood, moreover, felt Stalin. “Reform is inevitable, – he wrote, – but in his time. And it should be a reform of the organic, […] drawing on the traditions with the gradual restoration of the Orthodox consciousness (interestingly, you know these lines vehement detractors of Stalin from the ROC? – A. F.). Very soon, war for territory war will be replaced by “cold” for resources and energy. You need to be ready for it”.
This passage is worth a lot. Moreover, the leader of predicted resource wars that raged at the turn of XX–XXI centuries, he has recorded the necessity of reforms in the Psychosphere, knowing that hostilities will eventually move there and that reform must rely on tradition (conscious and unconscious), and not to reject and not to break it. This since 1991, actively engaged in many of our media, especially TV, however, without the success that we expected, and often counterproductive, oslabla the population, and, in fact, pushing for “a powerful impetus to the bubbling energy of the womb”. Of course, a significant portion of moral guidelines and imperatives destroyed over these 20 years and for 20 years prior to 1917, We see many manifestations of a moral crisis, and yet, the task of destruction of the Russian Psychosphere, the psychohistory of our enemy is not resolved (even computer shooting games have no effect on our children, as in the West – because of differences in the culture of laughter). And no wonder the officials fear anti-liberal revolution “and all” liberal “pyramid” (in both senses of the word) has remained alien, alien and hostile to the mass of the population, who feel slighted. I sang a group of “lube”: “But for the fact that Russia is offended,/ Emelyan Pugachev’t forgive you.” “Underworld” has always played in Russian history a much greater role than saw and were ready to recognize the “bar” is far from frightening people, oriented to the West, the authorities and professorial science. What can you advise to these guys? Read Russian history and works of Nobel laureate Ilya Prigogine on chaos, dissipative structures, self-organization and complexity. However, if not too late “to drink Borjomi”?
Not a revolution (especially in spirochaetal belolentochnye legs) should be feared and not the new Stalin, and something cooler and scarier than known in Russian history as the “Pugachev rebellion”, i.e. the reaction mass in an alien pyramid. Do not think that the times of Pugachevsky’ve gone through the Big System “Russia” they will not ever, can only change form. Pugachev and “village Ladomirova” (N. Leskov) is a constantly present dimension of Russian life, so to say it is parallel to the Lower world (NAV, Hel). He easily breaks in the Middle world, as the last defensive line in Russian life – physical substance, accumulated labor, property, right – historically weak. But today they repeatedly weakens the unjust (to put it mildly, but if not gently – that thieving, extortionate) the nature of the property in the 1990s. And who knows, we could end up not only able to tame a new breakthrough, Chaos — revolution and the new Stalin. Stalin was, together with Lenin, the tamer of Chaos through revolution, and then, independently, the tamer of the revolution (avoiding globalization) by red Empire “of capitalism in one, separately taken country” (incidentally, this subtly noticed N. Mandelstam in the “Second book”). And who knows, we don’t have a new Stalin to press-assemble-designing the authorities, of course, if the instinct is not atrophied completely, amazed strangers and alien to the informational currents, thought-forms, memes and conceptual viruses.
In “Order out of chaos” by I. Prigogine and I. Stengers give the following example. Microscopic flat worm trematode, parasitic in the liver of sheep and self-perpetuating there, get there independently and with swallowed a sheep the ant, in which trematodes should get. However, after that the likelihood that the sheep will swallow an infected ant, very small. The parasite, however, the “who decides” problem in a simple, but inexplicable to scientists way, turning a low probability in the maximum. “Can justifiably say, – write the authors of “Order out of chaos” – that trematodes “grabs” the body of his master. It penetrates into the brain of an ant and forces the victim to behave in a suicidal way: enslaved ant instead of being on the ground, climbs up the stalk of a plant and frozen on the very tip of a leaf, waiting for the sheep”. Perhaps the ant “seems” that he is free in his behavior or even “manages” a wiggle of the stalk (cf penguins on the tip of the iceberg). Actually he is a slave trematode, “invested” in his mind false and damning him for a “concept” behavior, completely eliminating the sense of self-preservation. We will put into place the “concept” of “controlled chaos” of “market reforms” and “human rights” – read C. Mann – and “oil painting” will be clear. Not by chance in information warfare first strike by the Psychosphere ruling class, especially its protective and immune structures (ideology and intelligence agencies) – in this respect, the history of the “Encyclopedia” in France of the XVIII century is highly instructive. The bottom line: with the blade you need to jump before it’s too late.
But back to the taming of Chaos, if it occurs. To solve this problem, a new Stalin will have to throw to the crowd, or as they used to say in Russia, “to give head” some, perhaps a significant portion of unrighteous fat, taking the most odious of them from anywhere – the Hooch from abroad, the Hooch out of the Asses of the devil, and the Hooch from the Kuyalnik and allowing others to “join our movement”. How to know whether destalinization to pray for the coming of a new Stalin, on hearing the heavy tread of the black man, and not Yesenin – the mirror, in the cylinder and with a cane, and Lermontov – real, with damask knife in hand. This “black man” is not “delusions of intelligence, terror Creswick” (M. Voloshin), to be more serious. It can bring a moment of truth to clarify the relationship between intentions and circumstances, the final decision of the question of their “negative dialectics”. And have, to paraphrase A. Block, request: “Stalin, can you give us a hand/ Help in a silent struggle.”